Andrew, On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Bresticker <abres...@chromium.org> wrote: >> I think this is supposed to be "xxti" which might or might not be >> "fin_pll". In the exynos4 code these are two different clocks that >> are chosen by OM[0]. I'd bet that 99% of the time they are the same, >> but it seems better to use "xxti". > > OM[0] also appears to mux the input here between "xxti" and "xusbxti" > as well. So this should probably remain "fin_pll".
Thanks! ...so I'm OK with this landing "as-is" or a re-spin with nits fixed, since all of the rest of my comments were just nits... _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
