On 6/18/2013 12:08 PM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
> From: Matt Porter <mpor...@ti.com>
>
> Changes by Joel:
> * Split EDMA xbar support out of original EDMA DT parsing patch
> to keep it easier for review.
> * Rewrite shift and offset calculation.
>
> Suggested-by: Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com>
> Suggested by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joel A Fernandes <joelag...@ti.com>
>
> Reference:
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2226991/
> ---
> arch/arm/common/edma.c | 59
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/platform_data/edma.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/edma.c b/arch/arm/common/edma.c
> index 9823b79..1c2fb15 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/edma.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/edma.c
> @@ -1410,6 +1410,52 @@ static int edma_of_read_u32_to_s16_array(const struct
> device_node *np,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int edma_xbar_event_map(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_node *node,
> + struct edma_soc_info *pdata, int len)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + int i;
> + struct resource res;
> + void *xbar;
void __iomem *xbar;
> + const s16 (*xbar_chans)[2];
> + u32 shift, offset, mux;
> +
> + xbar_chans = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> + len/sizeof(s16) + 2*sizeof(s16),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!xbar_chans)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 1, &res);
> + if (ret)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + xbar = devm_ioremap(dev, res.start, resource_size(&res));
> + if (!xbar)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = edma_of_read_u32_to_s16_array(node,
> + "ti,edma-xbar-event-map",
> + (s16 *)xbar_chans,
> + len/sizeof(u32));
> + if (ret)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + for (i = 0; xbar_chans[i][0] != -1; i++) {
> + shift = (xbar_chans[i][1] & 0x03) << 3;
> + offset = xbar_chans[i][1] & 0xfffffffc;
> + mux = readl((void *)((u32)xbar + offset));
Please drop unnecessary casting. Simply:
mux = readl(xbar + offset);
> + mux &= ~(0xff << shift);
> + mux |= xbar_chans[i][0] << shift;
> + writel(mux, (void *)((u32)xbar + offset));
Fix the writel likewise.
> + }
> +
> + pdata->xbar_chans = xbar_chans;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int edma_of_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
> struct device_node *node,
> struct edma_soc_info *pdata)
> @@ -1470,6 +1516,9 @@ static int edma_of_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
>
> pdata->default_queue = 0;
>
> + prop = of_find_property(node, "ti,edma-xbar-event-map", &sz);
> + if (prop)
> + ret = edma_xbar_event_map(dev, node, pdata, sz);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1489,6 +1538,7 @@ static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int status = -1;
> const s16 (*rsv_chans)[2];
> const s16 (*rsv_slots)[2];
> + const s16 (*xbar_chans)[2];
> int irq[EDMA_MAX_CC] = {0, 0};
> int err_irq[EDMA_MAX_CC] = {0, 0};
> struct resource *r[EDMA_MAX_CC] = {NULL, NULL};
> @@ -1617,6 +1667,15 @@ static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> + /* Clear the xbar mapped channels in unused list */
> + xbar_chans = info[j]->xbar_chans;
> + if (xbar_chans) {
> + for (i = 0; xbar_chans[i][1] != -1; i++) {
> + off = xbar_chans[i][1];
> + clear_bits(off, 1,
> + edma_cc[j]->edma_unused);
Please fix the alignment here.
Thanks,
Sekhar
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
