On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 02:10:21PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:02:42PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > > Having the kernel enforce that the DT node is present and at the right > > > location, I think, is helpful for the bootloader folks to ensure they > > > write correct DTs. > > > Granted. But then I wonder... why do we bother to put the BootROM in the > > DT window if we're going to check for a fixed address it in any case? > > Code re-use in the mbus driver? > > Maybe future SOCs in this family will have programmable SMP startup > addresses? > > Non-SMP systems don't need to map the boot rom at all? >
Three great answers :) -- Ezequiel GarcĂa, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss