Hi Sylwester, Jacek,

On Monday 01 of July 2013 17:22:29 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> From: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszew...@samsung.com>
> 
> This patch adds AK8975 magnetometer node and corresponding
> i2c-gpio bus node for TRATS2 board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszew...@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawro...@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-trats2.dts |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-trats2.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-trats2.dts index 056b835..b9de3b5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-trats2.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-trats2.dts
> @@ -19,6 +19,10 @@
>       model = "Samsung Trats 2 based on Exynos4412";
>       compatible = "samsung,trats2", "samsung,exynos4412";
> 
> +     aliases {
> +             i2c8 = &i2c_ak8975;
> +     };
> +
>       memory {
>               reg =  <0x40000000 0x40000000>;
>       };
> @@ -453,4 +457,19 @@
>       serial@13830000 {
>               status = "okay";
>       };
> +
> +     i2c_ak8975: i2c-gpio@0 {

I think this @0 is slightly incorrect here, as it seems like there is no 
reg property present inside the node and so the device isn't located at 
any address.

For logical indices like in this case I would rather use i2c-gpio-0 
instead.

> +             compatible = "i2c-gpio";
> +             gpios = <&gpy2 4 0>, <&gpy2 5 0>;
> +             i2c-gpio,delay-us = <2>;
> +             #address-cells = <1>;
> +             #size-cells = <0>;
> +             status = "okay";
> +
> +             ak8975@0c {
> +                     compatible = "asahi-kasei,ak8975";
> +                     reg = <0x0c>;
> +                     gpios = <&gpj0 7 0>;
> +             };
> +     };
>  };

Otherwise looks good.

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.f...@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Tomasz

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to