2013/7/9 Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:19:45AM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote: >> 2013/7/8 Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>: > >> > The obvious question here is of course if we can use the same driver for >> > both of them. > >> I haven't got a g20 to test that, but that's the goal. > > I think I do somewhere. > >> For now, g20 is still non-DT, so I think it's best to have a DT-only >> driver like this one for the 9x5 family (9g15, 9g25, 9x25, 9g35, >> 9x25). >> When the g20 will move to DT completely, we can drop sam9g20_wm8731.c >> and adjust sam9x5_wm8731.c (mainly master clock and widgets it seems) >> By the way, maybe g45 could use that also (and SAMA5 ?) > > If this is the goal then this driver needs a more generic name. Hum. I guess we could call it atmel-ssc-sound.c, since the ultimate goal would be to make it codec agnostic, but there's quite some work to achieve that (handle the widgets, mclk and rates by DT). But I really don't know if it's better to keep this name as long as g20 is not supported, and change it after or have a name that is not reflecting what the machine driver is doing right now. Maybe Bo or Nicolas can give their feeling on that (since I'm not Atmel, I don't know every SoC or what their Big Plan is for sound machine drivers)
Richard. -- for me, ck means con kolivas and not calvin klein... does it mean I'm a geek ? _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss