On 07/17/2013 04:54 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hello, > > Here's a small patch set that replaces PWM polarity numerical constants with > macros in DT.
The series, Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> I'm (very very) slightly hesitant about patch 3/4, since it's moving towards all PWMs having to use the same specifier format, whereas specifiers are at least potentially binding-specific, not device-type-specific. However, consistency is good; there's no need to do something different just for the heck of it. Equally, there's nothing actually stopping a new binding from defining its own format rather than simply deferring to pwm.txt if it absolutely has to, so I think this will turn out fine. _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
