There has been some discussion on various lists about what the binding
doc says w/regards to compat binding for eSHDC on 83xx, 85xx, pxxxx.
My thinking is that we wanted to avoid "fsl,eshdc" as possibly being
to generic (some theory that esdhc might be same or similar controller
on iMX devices from FSL). If that's the case I'm thinking something
like:
fsl,pq-eshdc (covers 83xx, 85xx family)
fsl,qoirq-esdhc (covers any new p2xxx, p4xxx, etc..)
and if imx needs it
fsl,imx-esdhc
this would be the base compatible. In addition to that we've
discussed having a fsl,pq-eshdc-vX.Y compat to match the IP version in
the specific SoC.
thoughts?
- k
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
