On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 12:22 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > If you are correct to insist that DMA needs yo be supported in the new > driver *even* with old firmware, then yes, maybe.
if DMA gives a performance boost for all workloads, what is the argument for not always enabling it ? > The alternative is a quirk to "fix" the DT up on the affected boards and > not actually doing the special cases in the driver itself. But that can be > seen as an implementation detail. I don't understand why having the soc-foo.h with the internal interrupt mapping in the kernel tree is a no-no, whereas it's ok to add the missing part of it in the form of fixups or directly in driver code. -- Maxime -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
