On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 08:42:31PM +0200, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote: > On 12/04/2013 08:28 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:34:46PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > >> On 11/27/2013 6:18 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: > >>> To reduce code duplicate and increase code readability use WDT core > >>> code to handle WDT interface. > >>> > >>> Remove io_lock as the WDT core uses mutex to lock each wdt device. > >>> Remove wdt_state as the WDT core tracks state with its own variable. > >>> > >>> The watchdog_init_timeout() can read timeout value from timeout-sec > >>> property if the passed value is out of bounds. The heartbeat is > >>> initialized in next way. If heartbeat is not set thought module > >>> parameter, try to read it's value from WDT node timeout-sec property. > >>> If node has no one, use default value. > >>> > >>> The heartbeat is hold in wdd->timeout by WDT core, so use it in > >>> order to set timeout period. > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilim...@ti.com> > >>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> > >>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronz...@ti.com> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 2 + > >>> drivers/watchdog/davinci_wdt.c | 147 > >>> ++++++++++------------------------------ > >>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig > >>> index 5be6e91..eb8c89d 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig > >>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig > >>> @@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ config IOP_WATCHDOG > >>> config DAVINCI_WATCHDOG > >>> tristate "DaVinci watchdog" > >>> depends on ARCH_DAVINCI > >>> + select WATCHDOG_CORE > >>> + select WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT > >> > >> Its not clear for change log why NOWAYOUT needs to be forced on all the > >> time for all users of DaVinci watchdog. > > ... you are right > > >> > > Actually, thinking about it, it is not necessary and can be replaced with > > > > watchdog_set_nowayout(wdd, 1); > > Good idea, I'll replace watchdog_set_nowayout(wdd, WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT) on it. > And delete "select WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT" > > > > > In other words, there is no need to force NOWAYOUT on _other_ watchdogs > > which > > may be present in the system. Still, you are right, it would be nice to > > explain > > in the changelog (or maybe even better as comment in the code) why it is > > enforced. > > > > Guenter > > > > Only question, should I repost only this patch or whole series? > Reposting only this patch should be sufficient if the others did not change.
Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
