> disable interrupts at runtime and use that as a state machine, while I was 
> wondering whether it wouldn't be simpler to keep all interrupts enabled at 
> all 
> time and handle the synchronization explicitly.

If I do this, I'll get another "spurious" interrupt telling me the transmit
register is empty again, even after I wrote the last byte. I don't like
this.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to