On Wednesday 05 February 2014, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 02/05/2014 10:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 February 2014, Michal Simek wrote:
> > Still, the choice of putting the timeout into DT in terms of
> > cycles rather than miliseconds wasn't ideal from an interface
> > perspective and we should change that if/when we do a generic
> > binding. I can definitely see where it's coming from for your
> > case, as the cycle count totally makes sense from an FPGA
> > tool perspective...
>
> Thanks. I take this like ACK for this current binding description.
>
Yes, please add my 'Acked-by'.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
