On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 10:21 +0000, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Is this an old HW, and presumably there won't be new users for it? If > yes, this is probably fine.
There is a DRM driver in the works, actually... > If not, you might want to look at the video > ports and endpoints, which is used by at least three not-yet-merged series: > > [PATCHv3 00/41] OMAPDSS: DT support v3 > [PATCH v5 00/11] imx-drm dt bindings > [RFC PATCH v2 00/21] Add DSI display support for Exynos based boards > > Using bindings like that would be more future proof, even if the current > driver doesn't use them. ... and this makes me try to get out of its way. In other words, I fully agree with you, but I don't think this applies to this particular patch, as I'm not even trying to represent the display pipeline. The (optional) "display-timings" sub-node has been "borrowed" from other older drivers and can be easily deprecated in the future, replaced by standard ones (whatever final shape they will take :-). All other extra properties are CLCD-specific and orthogonal. Pawel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
