On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 10:02:51AM +0100, Jingchang Lu wrote:
> From: Jingchang Lu <b35...@freescale.com>
>
> The LS1021A SoC is a dual-core Cortex-A7 based processor,
> this add the initial support for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingchang Lu <b35...@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 17 ++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile | 2 ++
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-ls1021a.c | 49
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-ls1021a.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> index bdfe276..7f24892 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
> @@ -762,6 +762,23 @@ config SOC_VF610
> help
> This enable support for Freescale Vybrid VF610 processor.
>
> +config FSL_SOC
> + bool
> +
> +config SOC_LS1021A
> + bool "Freescale LS1021A support"
> + select CPU_V7
> + select ARM_GIC
> + select CLKSRC_OF
> + select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
> + select HAVE_SMP
> + select FSL_SOC
> + select MIGHT_HAVE_PCI
> + select PCI_DOMAINS if PCI
> +
> + help
> + This enable support for Freescale LS1021A processor.
> +
> endif
>
> source "arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/Kconfig"
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile
> index a364e20..f49cbdb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile
> @@ -114,4 +114,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX53) += mach-imx53.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_VF610) += clk-vf610.o mach-vf610.o
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A) += mach-ls1021a.o
> +
> obj-y += devices/
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-ls1021a.c
> b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-ls1021a.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d1a9bb9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-ls1021a.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2013-2014 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> +
> +#include "common.h"
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id of_ls1021a_match_table[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "simple-bus",
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "fsl,ifc",
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "fsl,fpga-qixis",
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "fsl,qe",
> + },
> + {}
> +};
Are any of thse not always-on (or default-on) MMIO busses?
Is there any reason for not giving them their own drivers?
> +
> +static void __init ls1021a_init_machine(void)
> +{
> + mxc_arch_reset_init_dt();
This looks to only be used to set up a watchdog timer. Is there any
reason this logic can't be moved to the watchdog timer driver?
> + of_platform_populate(NULL, of_ls1021a_match_table, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static const char *ls1021a_dt_compat[] __initdata = {
> + "fsl,ls1021a",
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +DT_MACHINE_START(LS1021A, "Freescale LS1021A")
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> + .dma_zone_size = SZ_128M,
> +#endif
> + .init_machine = ls1021a_init_machine,
> + .dt_compat = ls1021a_dt_compat,
> + .restart = mxc_restart,
AFAICT, that jsut uses the WDT for restart. Why can't the watchdog
driver register itself as a restart device?
That would bring us close to an empty machine descriptor, and enable
reuse of the WDT and those busses.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
