Well hopefully this isn't too Nick Krouse-esque, but I have some
comments on my own patch below. I sat on these for a few days but have
noticed a few things after testing on another platform...
On Tue, Aug 12 2014 at 05:51:34 PM, Mitchel Humpherys <mitch...@codeaurora.org>
wrote:
> On some platforms with tight power constraints it is polite to only
> leave your clocks on for as long as you absolutely need them. Currently
> we assume that all clocks necessary for SMMU register access are always
> on.
>
> Add some optional device tree properties to specify any clocks that are
> necessary for SMMU register access and turn them on and off as needed.
>
> If no clocks are specified in the device tree things continue to work
> the way they always have: we assume all necessary clocks are always
> turned on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mitchel Humpherys <mitch...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt | 11 ++
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 127
> +++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
[...]
> -static int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +static int arm_smmu_init_clocks(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> + const char *cname;
> + struct property *prop;
> + int i;
> + struct device *dev = smmu->dev;
> +
> + smmu->num_clocks = of_property_count_strings(dev->of_node,
> + "clock-names");
> +
> + if (!smmu->num_clocks)
> + return 0;
> +
> + smmu->clocks = devm_kzalloc(
> + dev, sizeof(*smmu->clocks) * smmu->num_clocks,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!smmu->clocks) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Failed to allocate memory for clocks\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + i = 0;
> + of_property_for_each_string(dev->of_node, "clock-names",
> + prop, cname) {
> + struct clk *c = devm_clk_get(dev, cname);
> + if (IS_ERR(c)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get clock: %s",
> + cname);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + if (clk_get_rate(c) == 0) {
> + long rate = clk_round_rate(c, 1000);
> + clk_set_rate(c, rate);
> + }
> +
> + smmu->clocks[i] = c;
> +
> + ++i;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
The `static' was dropped unintentionally here.
-Mitch
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
