At 2014-09-04 02:04:24, "Mike Turquette" <mturque...@linaro.org> wrote: >Quoting Chao Xie (2014-08-25 21:38:14) >> From: Chao Xie <chao....@marvell.com> >> >> The register used by clk-frac may be shared with >> other clocks. >> So it needs to use spin lock to protect the register >> access. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Xie <chao....@marvell.com> > >This patch will break against the latest clk-next due to api changes. >You can see more here[0] and use this script to update your code if you >like[1]. > >Basically the calls to clk_set_rate need to be changed to >clk_provider_set_rate.
> I see the patch set [0] is V10 now, and it is not merged to clk-next yet. So should i wait for the patch set to be merged, then send out the updated patches? >[0] >http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1409758148-20104-1-git-send-email-tomeu.viz...@collabora.com> >[1] >http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/tomeu/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-refactoring-9&id=ea48c0d655346cce26329523cf24574f9ea8feee > >Regards, >Mike N嫥叉靣笡y氊b瞂千v豝�)藓{.n�+壏漽鴾z谵z)韰骅w*jg�秹殠娸/侁鋤罐枈�2娹櫒璀�&�)摺玜囤瓽珴閔�鎗:+v墾妛鑶佶