Mike Turquette <mturque...@linaro.org> writes: > Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2014-08-24 05:08:19) >> On Sunday 24 August 2014, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> > > By default, I'd expect Haojian to pick up the patches and send >> > > us a pull request. He sent an Ack, but also didn't make it clear >> > > that we should pick them up. >> > I was thinking that they would go through the clk maintainers, hence >> > Haojian's >> > ack. If they should go through arm-soc, they would need Mike's ack. > > Robert, > > I'm happy to take the patches but they will need to be rebased onto > clk-next and refactored to take into account Tomeu's api split[0].
Hi Mike, I have had a look at clk-next and Tomeu's split. My current understanding is that Tomeu's patches don't apply on your clk-next, as I get conflicts. So either I rebase my patches on top of Tomeu's tree (as this is what will drive most of the rebase work AFAIU), or I wait for Tomeu's tree to be merged into your clk-next. Is there any chance Tomeu's work ends up in your clk-next tree soon ? Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
