On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:03:00PM +0200, Christophe Ricard wrote:
> +_irq_probe:
> + /* IRQ */
> + r = irq_of_parse_and_map(pp, 0);
> + if (r < 0) {
> + pr_err("Unable to get irq, error: %d\n", r);
> + interrupts = 0;
> + goto _end;
> + }
> + interrupts = 1;
> + client->irq = r;
client->irq is already set correctly by of_i2c_register_devices - so I
don't think this sequence is necessary?
> + if (interrupts) {
> + r = devm_gpio_request_one(&client->dev, pdata->io_serirq,
> + GPIOF_IN, "TPM IO_SERIRQ");
Similarly, I wonder if pdata->io_serirq is just duplication of
client->irq and that should be set by the creator instead?
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id of_st33zp24_i2c_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "st,st33zp24_i2c", },
> + {}
> +};
missing:
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_st33zp24_i2c_match);
> + #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(of_st33zp24_i2c_match),
> + #endif
The #ifdef is unnecessary, the of_match_ptr macro takes care of that
already.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
