> So I'm a bit reluctant to create a dependency of the Armada XP
> suspend/resume code to a very large unmerged patch series that doesn't
> seem to even be close of having a consensus amongst the maintainers.

I totally agree.

> Isn't this something we can rework afterwards once the poweroff
> discussion has settled? I wouldn't mind declaring the particular
> aspects of the DT bindings related to the PIC GPIOs as "staging", so
> that we keep the freedom to change them for a few kernel releases until
> we settle on the final solution for that.

Yes. That seems very reasonable.

     Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to