On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:13:14PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Now that ACPI supports named GPIO properties, either through ACPI 5.1 or > the per-driver ACPI GPIO mappings, we can be more narrow about the way > GPIOs should be specified in Device Tree bindings. > > This patch updates the GPIO DT bindings documentation to highlight the > following rules for new GPIO bindings: > > - All new bindings must have a meaningful name (e.g. the "gpios" > property must not be used) > - The only suffix allowed is "-gpios", no matter the number of > descriptors in the property > - GPIOs can only be grouped under the same property when they serve the > same purpose, a case that should remain exceptional (e.g. bit-banged > data lines). > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acour...@nvidia.com> > CC: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> > CC: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net> > CC: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
