On Thursday 27 November 2014 21:14:59 Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > my impression is that with the
> > move to arm64, you should come up with a new binding that can fully
> > describe each controller so you don't have to add new code and bindings
> > for each future SoC that uses the same scheme.
>
> Still, this is exactly the same thing I thought when initially refactoring
> this
> driver 2 years ago and what was dismissed at that time due to people
> supposedly not wanting that much data in DT. If this point of view has
> changed,
> then I fully support your view, though.
I guess people were at the time underestimating the rate at which Samsung
comes out with new SoC variants that are all slightly different.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
