On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:14:23AM +0000, ttha...@opensource.altera.com wrote:
> From: Thor Thayer <ttha...@opensource.altera.com>
>
> Adding the device tree entries and bindings needed to support
> the Altera L2 cache and On-Chip RAM EDAC. This patch relies upon
> an earlier patch to declare and setup On-chip RAM properly.
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg51117.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <ttha...@opensource.altera.com>
> ---
> v2: Remove OCRAM declaration and reference prior patch.
>
> v3-5: No Change
> ---
> .../bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-l2-edac.txt | 15 +++++++++++++++
> .../bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-ocram-edac.txt | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-l2-edac.txt
> create mode 100644
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-ocram-edac.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-l2-edac.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-l2-edac.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..35b19e3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-l2-edac.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +Altera SoCFPGA L2 cache Error Detection and Correction [EDAC]
> +
> +Required Properties:
> +- compatible : Should be "altr,l2-edac"
> +- reg : Address and size for ECC error interrupt clear registers.
> +- interrupts : Should be single bit error interrupt, then double bit error
> + interrupt. Note the rising edge type.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + l2edac@ffd08140 {
> + compatible = "altr,l2-edac";
> + reg = <0xffd08140 0x4>;
> + interrupts = <0 36 1>, <0 37 1>;
> + };
Judging by the size of the reg entry, this is part of a larger block
(the same one the OCRAM EDAC lives in). Why isn't that larger block
described?
EDAC is a Linux subsystem name, but typically not the HW block name.
What HW block does this live in?
> diff --git
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-ocram-edac.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-ocram-edac.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..31ab205
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-ocram-edac.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +Altera SoCFPGA On-Chip RAM Error Detection and Correction [EDAC]
> +
> +OCRAM ECC Required Properties:
> +- compatible : Should be "altr,ocram-edac"
> +- reg : Address and size for ECC error interrupt clear registers.
> +- iram : phandle to On-Chip RAM definition.
> +- interrupts : Should be single bit error interrupt, then double bit error
> + interrupt. Note the rising edge type.
> +
> +Example:
> + ocramedac@ffd08144 {
> + compatible = "altr,ocram-edac";
> + reg = <0xffd08144 0x4>;
> + iram = <&ocram>;
> + interrupts = <0 178 1>, <0 179 1>;
> + };
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> index 6af96ed..32c63a3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> @@ -618,8 +618,21 @@
> interrupts = <0 39 4>;
> };
>
> + l2edac@ffd08140 {
> + compatible = "altr,l2-edac";
> + reg = <0xffd08140 0x4>;
> + interrupts = <0 36 1>, <0 37 1>;
> + };
> +
> + ocramedac@ffd08144 {
> + compatible = "altr,ocram-edac";
> + reg = <0xffd08144 0x4>;
> + iram = <&ocram>;
> + interrupts = <0 178 1>, <0 179 1>;
> + };
> +
> L2: l2-cache@fffef000 {
> - compatible = "arm,pl310-cache";
> + compatible = "arm,pl310-cache", "syscon";
NAK.
Why are you marking the PL310 as a syscon device? It is most definitely
_NOT_ a shared set of registers lumped together.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
