> +What: /sys/class/fpga_manager/<fpga>/firmware
> +Date: October 2014
> +KernelVersion: 3.18
> +Contact: Alan Tull <at...@opensource.altera.com>
> +Description: Name of the FPGA image file to load using firmware class.
This is wrong interface, right? The only use of this string is to pass
it to udev. We should simply pass "fpga-0" as a firware name, and let
udev figure it out, no need to to prepare name in separate component,
then pass it to kernel, which passes it back to udev.
> +What: /sys/class/fpga_manager/<fpga>/reset
> +Date: October 2014
> +KernelVersion: 3.18
> +Contact: Alan Tull <at...@opensource.altera.com>
> +Description: Write 1 to reset the FPGA
Does 0 need to be written there to pull the fpga out of reset? Is this
a suitable interface?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
