On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Olliver Schinagl <o.schin...@ultimaker.com> wrote:
> From: Olliver Schinagl <oli...@schinagl.nl> > > The gpio binding document says that new code should always use named > gpios. Patch 40b73183 added support to parse a list of gpios from child > nodes, but does not make it possible to use named gpios. This patch adds > the con_id property and implements it is done in gpiolib.c, where the > old-style of using unnamed gpios still works. > > Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <oli...@schinagl.nl> > --- > drivers/gpio/devres.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c | 2 +- > drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c | 2 +- > include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 1 + Alexandre: does this match your vision of how it should work, i.e. ACK? Bryan/Dmitry: can you ACK the oneliners in your subsystems? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
