On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:33:37AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_IRQ_DEMUX_CHIP > +/** > + * struct irq_chip_virt_demux - Dumb demultiplexer irq chip data structure
s/Dumb/Virtual/ ? > + * @domain: irq domain pointer > + * @available: Bitfield of valid irqs > + * @unmasked: Bitfield containing irqs status > + * @flags: irq_virt_demux_flags flags > + * @src_irq: irq feeding the virt demux chip > + * > + * Note, that irq_chip_generic can have multiple irq_chip_type > + * implementations which can be associated to a particular irq line of > + * an irq_chip_generic instance. That allows to share and protect > + * state in an irq_chip_generic instance when we need to implement > + * different flow mechanisms (level/edge) for it. This seems like a copy/paste from struct irq_chip_generic; it seems not relevant, seeing how irq_chip_virt_demux does not even have an irq_chip_type pointer list. Also, with a demuxer like this, we're bound to whatever flow type its host is, no? > +# Dumb interrupt demuxer chip implementation s/Dumb/Virtual/ ? > +#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_IRQ_DEMUX_CHIP > +/** > + * handle_virt_demux_irq - Dumb demuxer irq handle function. idem > + * @irq: the interrupt number > + * @desc: the interrupt description structure for this irq > + * > + * Dumb demux interrupts are sent from a demultiplexing interrupt handler idem > + * which is not able to decide which child interrupt handler should be > + * called. > + * > + * Note: The caller is expected to handle the ack, clear, mask and > + * unmask issues if necessary. > + */ If we're calling multiple handlers, how can they all do this and not collide? Over all it looks good -- in as far as my (admittedly stale IRQ braincells) go. I'll go queue up these bits, if you could send me a delta patch addressing these 'minor' comment issues? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
