On 02/17/2015 03:03 PM, Stathis Voukelatos wrote:
The framework registers each backend sniffer channel as a netdev,
which can be accessed from user space through a raw packet socket.
Packets received from user space are treated as a command string
configuration. Each match event from the backend driver will
generate a packet with the matching bytes plus an optional
timestamp, if configured by the command string.

Signed-off-by: Stathis Voukelatos <stathis.voukela...@linn.co.uk>
---
  MAINTAINERS                             |   6 +
  drivers/net/Kconfig                     |   2 +
  drivers/net/Makefile                    |   2 +
  drivers/net/pkt-sniffer/Kconfig         |   8 +
  drivers/net/pkt-sniffer/Makefile        |   3 +
  drivers/net/pkt-sniffer/core/module.c   |  37 +++++
  drivers/net/pkt-sniffer/core/netdev.c   | 254 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/net/pkt-sniffer/core/snf_core.h |  60 ++++++++
  include/uapi/linux/pkt_sniffer.h        |  33 +++++
  9 files changed, 405 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pkt-sniffer/Kconfig
  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pkt-sniffer/Makefile
  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pkt-sniffer/core/module.c
  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pkt-sniffer/core/netdev.c
  create mode 100644 drivers/net/pkt-sniffer/core/snf_core.h
  create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/pkt_sniffer.h

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index aaa039d..7d882de 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -5754,6 +5754,12 @@ M:       Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com>
  S:    Maintained
  F:    tools/lib/lockdep/

+LINN PACKET SNIFFER DRIVER
+M: Stathis Voukelatos <stathis.voukela...@linn.co.uk>
+S: Maintained
+F: drivers/net/pkt-sniffer/
+F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/linn-ether-packet-sniffer.txt

This whole framework really looks like only tailored to your specific
driver, I have no idea who else should reuse that?! So, I don't think
putting this under drivers/net/pkt-sniffer/ is a good idea.

Also it looks slightly confusing as if I understand you correctly, your
module's purpose is to pass down some "packet pattern" to the hardware
and match that in order to get a precise timestamp in return?

Might perhaps be better to have everything vendor-specific under something
like drivers/net/ethernet/linn/ and have the framework squashed into the
driver itself (if parts cannot be generalized in net/packet/).

It would be good if you can also avoid the extra uapi export. Perhaps
it's possible to reuse at least some of the existing timestamping
infrastructure?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to