On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:08:40PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> +static int sunxi_sid_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     const struct of_device_id *device;
> +     struct eeprom_sid *sid;
> +     struct resource *res;
> +     struct eeprom_device *eeprom;
> +     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +     int rval;
> +
> +     sid = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*sid), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!sid)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     eeprom = &sid->eeprom;
...
> +     rval = eeprom_register(eeprom);
> +     if (rval)
> +             return rval;
...
> +static int sunxi_sid_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct eeprom_device *eeprom = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +     return eeprom_unregister(eeprom);

As pointed out in the previous patch, this is unsafe as the eeprom
structure contains a struct device.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to