On 3/2/2015 5:06 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi Josh,
Thanks for a patch update. I think it looks good as a first step in your
patch series, just a minor comment below:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Josh Wu wrote:
In async probe, there is a case that ov2640 is probed before the
host device which provided 'mclk'.
To support this async probe, we will get 'mclk' at first in the probe(),
if failed it will return -EPROBE_DEFER. That will let ov2640 wait for
the host device probed.
Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh...@atmel.com>
---
Changes in v5:
- don't change the ov2640_s_power() code.
- will get 'mclk' at the beginning of ov2640_probe().
Changes in v4: None
Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2: None
drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/ov2640.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/ov2640.c
b/drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/ov2640.c
index 1fdce2f..057dd49 100644
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/ov2640.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/ov2640.c
@@ -1068,6 +1068,10 @@ static int ov2640_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ priv->clk = v4l2_clk_get(&client->dev, "mclk");
+ if (IS_ERR(priv->clk))
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+
v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&priv->subdev, client, &ov2640_subdev_ops);
v4l2_ctrl_handler_init(&priv->hdl, 2);
v4l2_ctrl_new_std(&priv->hdl, &ov2640_ctrl_ops,
@@ -1075,24 +1079,28 @@ static int ov2640_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
v4l2_ctrl_new_std(&priv->hdl, &ov2640_ctrl_ops,
V4L2_CID_HFLIP, 0, 1, 1, 0);
priv->subdev.ctrl_handler = &priv->hdl;
- if (priv->hdl.error)
- return priv->hdl.error;
-
- priv->clk = v4l2_clk_get(&client->dev, "mclk");
- if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
- goto eclkget;
+ if (priv->hdl.error) {
+ ret = priv->hdl.error;
+ goto err_clk;
}
ret = ov2640_video_probe(client);
if (ret) {
- v4l2_clk_put(priv->clk);
-eclkget:
- v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&priv->hdl);
+ goto err_videoprobe;
Since you add a "goto" here, you don't need an "else" after it, and the
"probed" success message should go down, so, just make it
ret = ov2640_video_probe(client);
if (ret < 0)
goto err_videoprobe;
ret = v4l2_async_register_subdev(&priv->subdev);
if (ret < 0)
goto err_videoprobe;
dev_info(&adapter->dev, "OV2640 Probed\n");
return 0;
err_...
Yes. This looks better.
I'll update and resend this patch. This change is independent and no
need to resend the whole patch series.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
Thanks
Guennadi
} else {
dev_info(&adapter->dev, "OV2640 Probed\n");
}
+ ret = v4l2_async_register_subdev(&priv->subdev);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto err_videoprobe;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_videoprobe:
+ v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&priv->hdl);
+err_clk:
+ v4l2_clk_put(priv->clk);
return ret;
}
@@ -1100,6 +1108,7 @@ static int ov2640_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct ov2640_priv *priv = to_ov2640(client);
+ v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&priv->subdev);
v4l2_clk_put(priv->clk);
v4l2_device_unregister_subdev(&priv->subdev);
v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&priv->hdl);
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
