On 2015/5/25 13:10, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2015 14:21:39 +0800, Zhou Wang wrote:
>>
>> This patch tries to unify ARM32 and ARM64 PCIe in designware driver. Delete
>> function dw_pcie_setup, dw_pcie_scan_bus, dw_pcie_map_irq and struct hw_pci,
>> move related operations to dw_pcie_host_init.
>>
>> I am not very clear about I/O resource management:
>>> if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>>> pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>>> global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>>> pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>>> global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>>> }
>> so just move steps in dw_pcie_setup to dw_pcie_host_init.
>>
>> I have compiled the driver with multi_v7_defconfig. However, I don't have
>> ARM32 PCIe related board to do test. It will be appreciated if someone could
>> help to test it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzh...@hisilicon.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 128
>> +++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> index 2e9f84f..7bad9e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>> #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <asm/hardirq.h>
>
> +cc Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Richard Zhu, Lucas Stach
>
Thanks to involve more related guys to this discussion :)
> Please use <linux/hardirq.h> and insert it alphabetically.
>
> +#include <linux/hardirq.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>
OK, will do in next version patch.
>>
>> #include "pcie-designware.h"
>>
>> @@ -67,17 +68,10 @@
>> #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC(x) (((x) & 0x7) << 16)
>> #define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET 0x91C
>>
>> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci;
>> +static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops;
>>
>> static unsigned long global_io_offset;
>>
>> -static inline struct pcie_port *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> - BUG_ON(!sys->private_data);
>> -
>> - return sys->private_data;
>> -}
>> -
>> int dw_pcie_cfg_read(void __iomem *addr, int where, int size, u32 *val)
>> {
>> *val = readl(addr);
>> @@ -238,7 +232,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp,
>> int irq)
>> static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
>> {
>> int irq, pos0, i;
>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(desc->dev->bus->sysdata);
>> + struct pcie_port *pp = desc->dev->bus->sysdata;
>>
>> pos0 = bitmap_find_free_region(pp->msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS,
>> order_base_2(no_irqs));
>> @@ -281,7 +275,7 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip,
>> struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> {
>> int irq, pos;
>> struct msi_msg msg;
>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(pdev->bus->sysdata);
>> + struct pcie_port *pp = pdev->bus->sysdata;
>>
>> if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -310,7 +304,7 @@ static void dw_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller
>> *chip, unsigned int irq)
>> {
>> struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
>> struct msi_desc *msi = irq_data_get_msi(data);
>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(msi->dev->bus->sysdata);
>> + struct pcie_port *pp = msi->dev->bus->sysdata;
>>
>> clear_irq_range(pp, irq, 1, data->hwirq);
>> }
>> @@ -342,13 +336,15 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
>> .map = dw_pcie_msi_map,
>> };
>>
>> -int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> +int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> {
>> struct device_node *np = pp->dev->of_node;
>> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pp->dev);
>> struct of_pci_range range;
>> struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
>> + struct pci_bus *bus;
>> struct resource *cfg_res;
>> + LIST_HEAD(res);
>> u32 val, na, ns;
>> const __be32 *addrp;
>> int i, index, ret;
>> @@ -502,15 +498,49 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> val |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
>> dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, 4, val);
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> - dw_pcie_msi_chip.dev = pp->dev;
>> - dw_pci.msi_ctrl = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> + /*
>> + * FIXME: we should really be able to use
>> + * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources on arm32 as well,
>> + * but the conversion needs some more testing
>> + */
>> + if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>> + pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>> + global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>> + pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>> + global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>> + }
>> + pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->mem,
>> + pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr);
>> + pci_add_resource(&res, &pp->busn);
>> +#else
>> + ret = of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(np, 0, 0xff, &res, &pp->io_base);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops,
>> + pp, &res);
>> + if (!bus)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>> + bus->msi = container_of(&pp->irq_domain, struct msi_controller, domain);
>> +#else
>> + bus->msi = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
>> #endif
>>
>> - dw_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
>> - dw_pci.private_data = (void **)&pp;
>> + pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>> + if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
>> + pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>>
>> - pci_common_init_dev(pp->dev, &dw_pci);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> + /* support old dtbs that incorrectly describe IRQs */
>> + pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
>> + pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -653,7 +683,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_valid_config(struct pcie_port *pp,
>> static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
>> int size, u32 *val)
>> {
>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
>> + struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
>> int ret;
>>
>> if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0) {
>> @@ -677,7 +707,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32
>> devfn, int where,
>> static int dw_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
>> int where, int size, u32 val)
>> {
>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
>> + struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
>> int ret;
>>
>> if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0)
>> @@ -701,64 +731,6 @@ static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
>> .write = dw_pcie_wr_conf,
>> };
>>
>> -static int dw_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> - struct pcie_port *pp;
>> -
>> - pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>> -
>> - if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>> - sys->io_offset = global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr;
>> - pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>> - global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>> - pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->io,
>> - sys->io_offset);
>> - }
>> -
>> - sys->mem_offset = pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr;
>> - pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->mem, sys->mem_offset);
>> - pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pp->busn);
>> -
>> - return 1;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static struct pci_bus *dw_pcie_scan_bus(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>> -{
>> - struct pci_bus *bus;
>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>> -
>> - pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
>
> 'pp->root_bus_nr' is initialized as '-1' at some soc-specific drivers
> However, 'sys->busnr' is set as '0, 1, 2 ...' by pcibios_init_hw()
> in arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c. '0, 1, 2 ...' means the number of
> each host controller.
>
> So, without setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2, ...',
> it makes the problem.
>
'sys->busnr' is set as "0, busn_res.end + 1 ..." in pcibios_init_hw() I think:
pcibios_init_hw()
for (nr = busnr = 0; nr < hw->nr_controllers; nr++)
sys->busnr = busnr;
...
busnr = sys->bus->busn_res.end + 1;
and it indicates root bus number of one pcie controller.
so in dw_pcie_scan_bus:
pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
bus = pci_create_root_bus(..., sys->busnr, ...);
we set root bus number as "0, busn_res.end + 1". But in pcie-designware,
nr_controllers is set as 1, so it only comes into the loop in
pcibios_init_hw() one time.
so how about we set 0 as default value of pp->root_bus_nr, then use
pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops, pp, &res);
to create root bus?
> Thus, we need to come up with the way to resolve this.
>
> 1. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by each soc-specific driver.
>
> e.g)
>
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
> @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int __init exynos_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port
> *pp,
> }
> }
>
> - pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> + pp->root_bus_nr++;
> pp->ops = &exynos_pcie_host_ops;
>
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int __init imx6_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
> }
> }
>
> - pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> + pp->root_bus_nr++;
> pp->ops = &imx6_pcie_host_ops;
>
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int __init ks_add_pcie_port(struct keystone_pcie
> *ks_pcie,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> + pp->root_bus_nr++;
> pp->ops = &keystone_pcie_host_ops;
>
> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int ls_add_pcie_port(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
> pp = &pcie->pp;
> pp->dev = pcie->dev;
> pp->dbi_base = pcie->dbi;
> - pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> + pp->root_bus_nr++;
> pp->ops = &ls_pcie_host_ops;
>
> ./drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int spear13xx_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
> + pp->root_bus_nr++;
> pp->ops = &spear13xx_pcie_host_ops;
>
>
> 2. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by pcie-designware.c
>
> I believe that someone will give better idea. :-)
>
>> - bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, sys->busnr,
>> - &dw_pcie_ops, sys, &sys->resources);
>> - if (!bus)
>> - return NULL;
>> -
>> - pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>> -
>> - if (bus && pp->ops->scan_bus)
>> - pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>> -
>> - return bus;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int dw_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
>> -{
>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(dev->bus->sysdata);
>> - int irq;
>> -
>> - irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, slot, pin);
>> - if (!irq)
>> - irq = pp->irq;
>> -
>> - return irq;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci = {
>> - .setup = dw_pcie_setup,
>> - .scan = dw_pcie_scan_bus,
>> - .map_irq = dw_pcie_map_irq,
>> -};
>
> Right, 'struct hw_pci' should not be used in order to unify ARM32 and
> ARM64. I have no objection to remove 'struct hw_pci' from 'pcie-designware.c'.
> Thank you for your patch.
>
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
>
Many thanks for your reviewing!
Zhou Wang
>> -
>> void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> {
>> u32 val;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
