On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Hans de Goede wrote:

> Add a cell for the usb power_supply part of the axp20x PMICs.
> 
> Note that this cell is only for the usb power_supply part and not the
> ac-power / battery-charger / rtc-backup-bat-charger bits.
> 
> Depending on the board each of those must be enabled / disabled separately
> in devicetree as most boards do not use all 4. So in dt each one needs its
> own child-node of the axp20x node. Another reason for using separate child
> nodes for each is so that other devicetree nodes can have a power-supply
> property with a phandle referencing a node representing a single
> power-supply.
> 
> The decision to use a separate devicetree node for each is reflected on
> the kernel side by each getting its own mfd-cell / platform_device and
> platform-driver.
> 
> Note this commit also makes some whitespace changes to the intialization
> of existing cells in axp20x_cells, these are pure whitespace changes,
> functionally nothing changes.
> 
> Cc: Bruno Prémont <bonb...@linux-vserver.org>
> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bruno Prémont <bonb...@linux-vserver.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> -Use DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED
> -Change indentation of axp20x_cells initializers to avoid line wrapping
> Changes in v3:
> -Improve commit message
> -Add Bruno's S-o-b
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

For my own reference:
  Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>

Are these two patches tied to any other in the set, or can I apply
them separately?

> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> index f9a3c2d..ca4a604 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,13 @@ static struct resource axp20x_pek_resources[] = {
>       },
>  };
>  
> +static struct resource axp20x_usb_power_supply_resources[] = {
> +     DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP20X_IRQ_VBUS_PLUGIN, "VBUS_PLUGIN"),
> +     DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP20X_IRQ_VBUS_REMOVAL, "VBUS_REMOVAL"),
> +     DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP20X_IRQ_VBUS_VALID, "VBUS_VALID"),
> +     DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP20X_IRQ_VBUS_NOT_VALID, "VBUS_NOT_VALID"),
> +};
> +
>  static struct resource axp22x_pek_resources[] = {
>       {
>               .name   = "PEK_DBR",
> @@ -363,11 +370,16 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip 
> axp288_regmap_irq_chip = {
>  
>  static struct mfd_cell axp20x_cells[] = {
>       {
> -             .name                   = "axp20x-pek",
> -             .num_resources          = ARRAY_SIZE(axp20x_pek_resources),
> -             .resources              = axp20x_pek_resources,
> +             .name           = "axp20x-pek",
> +             .num_resources  = ARRAY_SIZE(axp20x_pek_resources),
> +             .resources      = axp20x_pek_resources,
>       }, {
> -             .name                   = "axp20x-regulator",
> +             .name           = "axp20x-regulator",
> +     }, {
> +             .name           = "axp20x-usb-power-supply",
> +             .of_compatible  = "x-powers,axp202-usb-power-supply",
> +             .num_resources  = ARRAY_SIZE(axp20x_usb_power_supply_resources),
> +             .resources      = axp20x_usb_power_supply_resources,
>       },
>  };
>  

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to