On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:44 +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> This patch adds just providers part of the framework just to enable easy
> review.

Trivial notes:

> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c

> +struct nvmem_device {
> +     const char              *name;
> +     struct regmap           *regmap;
[]
> +struct nvmem_cell {
> +     const char *name;
> +     int                     offset;
> +     int                     bytes;

It'd be nicer to use consistent indentation for *name
in nvmem_cell

> +static ssize_t bin_attr_nvmem_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> +                                 struct bin_attribute *attr,
> +                                 char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
> +{
[]
> +     count = count/nvmem->word_size * nvmem->word_size;

maybe rounddown() ?

> +static ssize_t bin_attr_nvmem_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> +                                  struct bin_attribute *attr,
> +                                  char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
> +{

> +     count = count/nvmem->word_size * nvmem->word_size;

and rounddown() here too ?

> +static struct nvmem_device *of_nvmem_find(struct device_node *nvmem_np)
> +{
> +     struct device *d;
> +
> +     if (!nvmem_np)
> +             return NULL;
> +
> +     d = bus_find_device(&nvmem_bus_type, NULL, nvmem_np, of_nvmem_match);
> +
> +     return d ? to_nvmem_device(d) : NULL;
> +}

Perhaps more common as

        d = bus_find_device(&nvmem_bus_type, NULL, nvmem_np, of_nvmem_match);
        if (!d)
                return NULL;

        return to_nvmem_device(d);
}

> +struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(struct nvmem_config *config)
> +{
[]
> +     nvmem->read_only = nvmem->dev.of_node ?
> +                             of_property_read_bool(nvmem->dev.of_node,
> +                             "read-only") :
> +                             config->read_only;

odd indentation.
Normally, "read-only" would be aligned with nvmem->dev.of_node,

> +     dev_dbg(&nvmem->dev, "Registering nvmem device %s\n",
> +             dev_name(&nvmem->dev));

Isn't this going to have duplicated dev_name prefix and postfix?

> +     if (device_create_bin_file(&nvmem->dev,
> +                             nvmem->read_only ? &bin_attr_ro_nvmem :
> +                             &bin_attr_rw_nvmem))
> +             dev_info(&nvmem->dev, "Failed to create sysfs binary file\n");

Is the KERN_LEVEL correct?
Maybe dev_err/notice/warn/dbg?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to