On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 07:43:48PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 08/06/2015 02:11 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>On P7IOC, the whole DMA32 space is divided evenly to 256MB segments.
>>Each PE can consume one or multiple DMA32 segments. Current code
>>doesn't trace the available DMA32 segments and those consumed by
>>one particular PE. It's conflicting with PCI hotplug.
>>
>>The patch introduces one bitmap to PHB to trace the available
>>DMA32 segments for allocation, more fields to "struct pnv_ioda_pe"
>>to trace the consumed DMA32 segments by the PE, which is going to
>>be released when the PE is destroyed at PCI unplugging time.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>---
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 40
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 4 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>index cd22002..57ba8fd 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>@@ -1946,6 +1946,7 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_setup_dma_pe(struct pnv_phb
>>*phb,
>>
>> /* Grab a 32-bit TCE table */
>> pe->dma32_seg = base;
>>+ pe->dma32_segcount = segs;
>> pe_info(pe, " Setting up 32-bit TCE table at %08x..%08x\n",
>> (base << 28), ((base + segs) << 28) - 1);
>>
>>@@ -2006,8 +2007,13 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_setup_dma_pe(struct pnv_phb
>>*phb,
>> return;
>> fail:
>> /* XXX Failure: Try to fallback to 64-bit only ? */
>>- if (pe->dma32_seg >= 0)
>>+ if (pe->dma32_seg >= 0) {
>>+ bitmap_clear(phb->ioda.dma32_segmap,
>>+ pe->dma32_seg, pe->dma32_segcount);
>> pe->dma32_seg = -1;
>>+ pe->dma32_segcount = 0;
>>+ }
>>+
>> if (tce_mem)
>> __free_pages(tce_mem, get_order(TCE32_TABLE_SIZE * segs));
>> if (tbl) {
>>@@ -2443,12 +2449,11 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma_pe(struct pnv_phb
>>*phb,
>> pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma(pe, pe->pbus);
>> }
>>
>>-static unsigned int pnv_ioda1_setup_dma(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe,
>>- unsigned int base)
>>+static void pnv_ioda1_setup_dma(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>> {
>> struct pci_controller *hose = phb->hose;
>>- unsigned int dma_weight, segs;
>>+ unsigned int dma_weight, base, segs;
>>
>> /* Calculate the PHB's DMA weight */
>> dma_weight = pnv_ioda_phb_dma_weight(phb);
>>@@ -2461,11 +2466,28 @@ static unsigned int pnv_ioda1_setup_dma(struct
>>pnv_phb *phb,
>> else
>> segs = (pe->dma32_weight *
>> phb->ioda.dma32_segcount) / dma_weight;
>>+
>>+ /*
>>+ * Allocate DMA32 segments. We might not have enough
>>+ * resources available. However we expect at least one
>>+ * to be available.
>>+ */
>>+ do {
>>+ base = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(phb->ioda.dma32_segmap,
>>+ phb->ioda.dma32_segcount,
>>+ 0, segs, 0);
>>+ if (base < phb->ioda.dma32_segcount) {
>>+ bitmap_set(phb->ioda.dma32_segmap, base, segs);
>>+ break;
>>+ }
>>+ } while (--segs);
>
>
>If segs==0 before entering the loop, the loop will execute 0xfffffffe times.
>Make it for(;segs;--segs){ }.
>
The segs is always equal to 1 or more than that. However, "for()" statement
seems better and I'll change it.
>
>>+
>>+ if (WARN_ON(!segs))
>>+ return;
>>+
>> pe_info(pe, "DMA weight %d, assigned %d segments\n",
>> pe->dma32_weight, segs);
>> pnv_pci_ioda_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe, base, segs);
>>-
>>- return segs;
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>>@@ -2933,20 +2955,18 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_setup_DMA(void)
>> struct pci_controller *hose, *tmp;
>> struct pnv_phb *phb;
>> struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>>- unsigned int base;
>>
>> list_for_each_entry_safe(hose, tmp, &hose_list, list_node) {
>> phb = hose->private_data;
>> pnv_pci_ioda_setup_opal_tce_kill(phb);
>>
>>- base = 0;
>> list_for_each_entry(pe, &phb->ioda.pe_dma_list, dma_link) {
>> if (!pe->dma32_weight)
>> continue;
>>
>> switch (phb->type) {
>> case PNV_PHB_IODA1:
>>- base += pnv_ioda1_setup_dma(phb, pe, base);
>>+ pnv_ioda1_setup_dma(phb, pe);
>> break;
>> case PNV_PHB_IODA2:
>> pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe);
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>index 574fe43..1dc9578 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct pnv_ioda_pe {
>>
>> /* "Base" iommu table, ie, 4K TCEs, 32-bit DMA */
>> int dma32_seg;
>>+ int dma32_segcount;
>> struct iommu_table_group table_group;
>>
>> /* 64-bit TCE bypass region */
>>@@ -153,10 +154,11 @@ struct pnv_phb {
>> unsigned int io_segsize;
>> unsigned int io_pci_base;
>>
>>- /* IO, M32, M64 segment maps */
>>+ /* IO, M32, M64, DMA32 segment maps */
>> unsigned long io_segmap[8];
>> unsigned long m32_segmap[8];
>> unsigned long m64_segmap[8];
>>+ unsigned long dma32_segmap[8];
>>
>> /* PE allocation */
>> struct mutex pe_alloc_mutex;
>>
Thanks,
Gavin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
