On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 01:53:52PM +0800, Yuan Yao wrote:

> +Examples:
> +
> +     qdma: qdma@8390000 {
> +             compatible = "fsl,ls-qdma";
> +             reg = <0x0 0x8380000 0x0 0x20000>;
> +             interrupts = <GIC_SPI 170 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                             <GIC_SPI 185 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +             interrupt-names = "qdma-tx", "qdma-err";
> +             big-endian;
> +             channels = <1>;
> +     };

Binding should be a separate patch

> +FREESCALE qDMA DRIVER
> +M:     Yuan Yao <yao.y...@freescale.com>
> +L:     linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org

not dmaengine ML ?


> +config FSL_QDMA
> +     tristate "Freescale qDMA engine support"
> +     select DMA_ENGINE
> +     select DMA_VIRTUAL_CHANNELS

No depends on arch, can it work on x86?

> +static int fsl_qdma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *chan)
> +{
> +     struct fsl_qdma_chan *fsl_chan = to_fsl_qdma_chan(chan);
> +
> +     fsl_chan->desc = NULL;
> +     return 0;
> +}

why do you need this it seems to do nothing

> +static struct fsl_qdma_desc *fsl_qdma_alloc_desc(struct fsl_qdma_chan 
> *fsl_chan)
> +{
> +     struct fsl_qdma_desc *fsl_desc;
> +
> +     fsl_desc = kzalloc(sizeof(*fsl_desc), GFP_NOWAIT);
> +

empty line here is not required

> +     if (!fsl_desc)
> +             return NULL;
> +
> +     fsl_desc->qchan = fsl_chan;
> +
> +     return fsl_desc;

why not return fsl_desc->qchan ;


> +     dma_cap_set(DMA_PRIVATE, fsl_qdma->dma_dev.cap_mask);
> +     dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, fsl_qdma->dma_dev.cap_mask);
> +     dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, fsl_qdma->dma_dev.cap_mask);
> +
> +     fsl_qdma->dma_dev.dev = &pdev->dev;
> +     fsl_qdma->dma_dev.device_alloc_chan_resources
> +             = fsl_qdma_alloc_chan_resources;
> +     fsl_qdma->dma_dev.device_free_chan_resources
> +             = fsl_qdma_free_chan_resources;
> +     fsl_qdma->dma_dev.device_tx_status = fsl_qdma_tx_status;
> +     fsl_qdma->dma_dev.device_prep_dma_memcpy = fsl_qdma_prep_memcpy;
> +     fsl_qdma->dma_dev.device_issue_pending = fsl_qdma_issue_pending;

You claim DMA_SLAVE but no prep_ for that?

> +
> +static int __init fsl_qdma_init(void)
> +{
> +     return platform_driver_register(&fsl_qdma_driver);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(fsl_qdma_init);
why subsys_init?

-- 
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to