On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:08:58PM +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> HI
> How I am support to handle this patch? Should I just fix these warnings in
> my patch or I just add this as a separate patch on the top of the series?
Alim, you can simply fold it into your patch.
Thanks,
Fengguang
> On 10/01/2015 04:34 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com>
> >---
> > phy-exynos-ufs.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c
> >index 343fcaf..835ee78 100644
> >--- a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c
> >+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c
> >@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static bool match_cfg_to_pwr_mode(u8 desc, u8 required_pwr)
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> >-int exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_cfg_tag tag, u8 pwr)
> >+static int exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_cfg_tag tag,
> >u8 pwr)
> > {
> > struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy);
> > struct exynos_ufs_phy_cfg **cfgs = ufs_phy->cfg;
> >@@ -93,14 +93,14 @@ out:
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> >-void exynos_ufs_phy_set_lane_cnt(struct phy *phy, u8 lane_cnt)
> >+static void exynos_ufs_phy_set_lane_cnt(struct phy *phy, u8 lane_cnt)
> > {
> > struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy);
> >
> > ufs_phy->lane_cnt = lane_cnt;
> > }
> >
> >-int exynos_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(struct phy *phy)
> >+static int exynos_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(struct phy *phy)
> > {
> > struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy);
> > const unsigned int timeout_us = 100000;
> >
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list
> kbuild-...@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild-all
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
