Hi Laurent,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 24 October 2015 19:34:03 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> > On 10/22, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> As I want to have as much clock data/code __init as possible (think
>> >> multi-platform kernels --- pinmux data is a disaster here), I have to use
>> >> platform_driver_probe().
>
> That sounds like an __init issue, doesn't it ? The CPG driver will always be
> builtin and probed during the init process, what's preventing us from using
> normal driver probing ?
When using platform_driver_register(), the tables cannot be __init, as that
would cause a section type mismatch. Remember, the driver core handles
platform devices appearing later, so .probe() should continue to be available.
Note: in theory it should be possible to compile the CPG/MSSR driver as a
module, and have the module in your initramfs. But I don't think anyone
really wants to do that?
>> For new SoCs like r8a7795 we can probably just make it a real platform
>> driver, and make sure the irqc node is located after the cpg node in the
>> .dtsi.
>
> That's another hack :-) We really shouldn't depend on DT nodes order.
I agree. But if there's an unfixed bug somewhere else, we cannot introduce
regressions (for already supported SoCs).
> I'm all for getting rid of CLK_OF_DECLARE
Me too.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
