On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Kim, Milo <milo....@ti.com> wrote: > > On 11/3/2015 12:02 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Milo Kim <milo....@ti.com> wrote: >>> >>> LM3532, LM3631, LM3632, LM3633, LM3695 and LM3697 use common dt-bindings >>> for describing device. >>> >>> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org >>> Cc: Jingoo Han <jingooh...@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> >>> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: Milo Kim <milo....@ti.com> >>> --- >>> .../bindings/video/backlight/ti-lmu-backlight.txt | 67 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> >> Please move to bindings/leds/backlight/ > > > There are backlight bindings under video/backlight. I'd like to know why
Not if you look in linux-next. > this 'led' location is preferred. My guess is most of properties are from > common LED properties. Any other reasons? Yes, that is the main reason. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
