On 11/05/2015 12:12 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
In pnv_ioda_setup_dma(), it's unnecessary to calculate the DMA32
segments for PEs on PHB3 as the whole available DMA32 space can
be assigned to one specific PE on PHB3.

This splits pnv_ioda_setup_dma() to pnv_pci_ioda1_setup_dma() and
pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma() in order to avoid calculating DMA32
segments for PEs on PHB3. No logical changes introduced.


This patch is not needed as

[PATCH v7 20/50] powerpc/powernv: Improve DMA32 segment calculation

moves this calculation to another place (which already makes this patch unnecessary) and

[PATCH v7 26/50] powerpc/powernv: Create PEs at PCI hot plugging time

removes just introduced pnv_pci_ioda1_setup_dma() - if you remove it, then there is no point in fixing it in the first place.


Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gws...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index 5a08e20..4c2e023 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
@@ -2383,7 +2383,7 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma_pe(struct pnv_phb 
*phb,
                pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma(pe, pe->pbus);
  }

-static void pnv_ioda_setup_dma(struct pnv_phb *phb)
+static void pnv_pci_ioda1_setup_dma(struct pnv_phb *phb)
  {
        struct pci_controller *hose = phb->hose;
        unsigned int residual, remaining, segs, tw, base;
@@ -2428,26 +2428,30 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_dma(struct pnv_phb *phb)
                                segs = remaining;
                }

-               /*
-                * For IODA2 compliant PHB3, we needn't care about the weight.
-                * The all available 32-bits DMA space will be assigned to
-                * the specific PE.
-                */
-               if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA1) {
-                       pe_info(pe, "DMA weight %d, assigned %d DMA32 
segments\n",
-                               pe->dma_weight, segs);
-                       pnv_pci_ioda1_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe, base, segs);
-               } else {
-                       pe_info(pe, "Assign DMA32 space\n");
-                       segs = 0;
-                       pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe);
-               }
+               pe_info(pe, "DMA weight %d, assigned %d DMA32 segments\n",
+                       pe->dma_weight, segs);
+               pnv_pci_ioda1_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe, base, segs);

                remaining -= segs;
                base += segs;
        }
  }

+static void pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma(struct pnv_phb *phb)
+{
+       struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
+
+       pnv_pci_ioda_setup_opal_tce_kill(phb);
+
+       list_for_each_entry(pe, &phb->ioda.pe_dma_list, dma_link) {
+               if (!pe->dma_weight)
+                       continue;
+
+               pe_info(pe, "Assign DMA32 space\n");
+               pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe);
+       }
+}
+
  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
  static void pnv_ioda2_msi_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
  {
@@ -2931,10 +2935,13 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_setup_DMA(void)
        struct pnv_phb *phb;

        list_for_each_entry_safe(hose, tmp, &hose_list, list_node) {
-               pnv_ioda_setup_dma(hose->private_data);
+               phb = hose->private_data;
+               if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA1)
+                       pnv_pci_ioda1_setup_dma(phb);
+               else
+                       pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma(phb);

                /* Mark the PHB initialization done */
-               phb = hose->private_data;
                phb->initialized = 1;
        }
  }



--
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to