On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:31:54PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/06, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> > 
> > Thanks for your feedback!
> > 
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:29:02PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +       mux = kzalloc(sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +       if (!mux)
> > > [..]
> > > > +               goto free_reset;
> > > > +       }
> > > > +
> > > > +       return;
> > > > +
> > > > +free_reset:
> > > > +       kfree(reset_data);
> > > > +free_clk:
> > > > +       clk_unregister(clk);
> > > 
> > > We really ought to have a clk_composite_unregister() API.
> > 
> > Can we?
> > 
> > We can always unregister the clock itself, but do we have a way to
> > retrieve the structure that has been allocated in there?
> > 
> > (note that it also applies to the generic clocks registration: muxes,
> > dividers, and so on).
> 
> Yes we have a way. We've done the same sort of design for other
> generic clocks. Do the __clk_get_hw() thing like in clk-divider.c

Ack. I'll cook up a patch for this then.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to