Hi Michael.  Yes, Flexbackup is not very easy to use.  Here is a few tips I
picked up from Peter Samuel during our Flexbackup testing.  The e-smith
implementation of Flexbackup uses 'dump'.  Dump doesn't use/create indexes.
(Go figure) So, the -toc command doesn't have anything to report.  Try this
for testing:

flexbackup -fs /tmp
mt -f /dev/st0 fsf 1
flexbackup -extract

Note -extract will extract into your current directory location.  My
recommendation, use Taper :)

Regards,

Darrell

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Doerner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 9:23 PM
> To: e-smith-devinfo (E-mail)
> Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Flexbackup -toc ..result: This tape doesn't
> have an index!
> 
> 
> I am trying flexbackup again (under e-smith 4.01) and find it a bit
> difficult ...
> 
> For testing purposes, I do a backup for a specific directory with
> 
> 1. initialise a new tape: "flexbackup  -newtape"
> which results in:
> 
> flexbackup version 0.9.8 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> /etc/flexbackup.conf syntax OK
> 
> |------------------------------------------------
> | Rewinding & erasing tape...
> | Creating index key 200101221755.21
> |------------------------------------------------
> 
> 2. run the backup with "flexbackup  -fs /tmp"
> results:
> 
> flexbackup version 0.9.8 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> /etc/flexbackup.conf syntax OK
> 
> |------------------------------------------------
> | Doing level 0 backup of /tmp using dump
> | ERROR: This tape doesn't have an index! (use -erase?)
> | Making sure tape is at end of data...
> |------------------------------------------------
> At block 3.
> |------------------------------------------------
> | Backup of: /tmp
> | Note: $exclude_expr is ignored for dump
> | Date of this level 0 backup: Mon Jan 22 18:04:14 2001
> | Date of last level 0 backup: the epoch
> |------------------------------------------------
> | (dump -0 -b 64 -B 4000000 -f - /tmp | gzip -4) | buffer -m 
> 3m -s 64k -u
> 100 \
> |  -t -p 75 -B -o /dev/nst0
> |------------------------------------------------
>   DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Mon Jan 22 18:04:14 2001
>   DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch
>   DUMP: Dumping /dev/sda6 (/) to standard output
>   DUMP: mapping (Pass I) [regular files]
>   DUMP: mapping (Pass II) [directories]
>   DUMP: estimated 565 tape blocks.
>   DUMP: Volume 1 started at: Mon Jan 22 18:04:15 2001
>   DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories]
>   DUMP: dumping (Pass IV) [regular files]
>   DUMP: DUMP: 494 tape blocks
>   DUMP: finished in less than a second
>   DUMP: Volume 1 completed at: Mon Jan 22 18:04:15 2001
>   DUMP: DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Mon Jan 22 18:04:14 2001
>   DUMP: DUMP: Date this dump completed:  Mon Jan 22 18:04:15 2001
>   DUMP: DUMP: Average transfer rate: 0 KB/s
>   DUMP: DUMP IS DONE
> Kilobytes Out 64
> |------------------------------------------------
> | Backup start: Mon Jan 22 18:04:14 2001
> | Backup end:   Mon Jan 22 18:04:18 2001
> |------------------------------------------------
> At block 5.
> |------------------------------------------------
> | Rewinding...
> | Compressing log (tmp.0.20010122.gz)
> | Linking tmp.latest.gz -> tmp.0.20010122.gz
> |------------------------------------------------
> 
> There are already a few questions:
> 1. Dump talks about 494 tape blocks but the log makes me 
> believe the data
> takes from block 3 to block 5 only (might be different 
> "blocks" meant here?)
> 2. Average transfer rate 0 KB?
> 
> When I try "flexbackup -toc"
> results:
> flexbackup version 0.9.8 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> /etc/flexbackup.conf syntax OK
> 
> |------------------------------------------------
> | ERROR: This tape doesn't have an index! (use -erase?)
> |------------------------------------------------
> 
> And here I am stuck. BTW, it's an older SCSI tape device, a 
> Wangdat 3200.
> 
> Anybody with more experience for that? Darrell, Brandon where 
> are you ;-)
> 
> Regards,
> Michael Doerner
> 
> 
> --
> This list is archived
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Reply via email to