because generally for high trafic sites etc.. you want to be fiddeling with
the apache settings add harddrives etc..
When you want a lot of flexibility the management console is an obstacle
rather than an asset.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gordon Rowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 23 augustus 2001 3:08
To: Jelmer
Cc: Alexander Wallace; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Advise...
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 02:36:44AM +0200, Jelmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> e-smith is just a customid redhat so it probably could be, but i wouldn't
> recommendend it as it is specificly targetted to small and medium sized
> enterprises.. You would probably be better off with standard redhat,suse
> slackware whatever...
Why do it the hard way?
The performance of e-smith will be identical to the performance of
RedHat (since we use the same kernel, libraries, etc.), and we provide
a management layer on top.
Packages which install on the corresponding RedHat release will install
directly on e-smith and you can manually configure them if you wish,
or add templates and actions to have it done automatically.
Gordon
--
Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VP Engineering
Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com
Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
