On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Darrell May wrote:
> Has anyone at Mitel tested and got procmail to work under SME5?
No, procmail is unused by SME5.
> By chance has there been any changes to the mail subsystem that may
> have effected the ability for procmail to work?
Not any that was not a side effect of upgrading to the latest available
RedHat packages. As you have reported elsewhere, the full path name is
required if you create .qmail files which execute procmail. In any case,
for security reasons, it is always wise to specify full path names.
Regards
Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lead Product Developer
Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com/
Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com/
Phone: +1 (613) 368 4376 or 564 8000 Fax: +1 (613) 564 7739
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
