On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 06:30:06PM -0800, Des Dougan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 17:03 12/11/2001, Gordon Rowell wrote: > >Finally, should we be using %L (login server) or %N (netbios name of > >this server)? We are currently using %N and I don't see a reason to > >change.
And I was wrong... > Just to be clear on this - the shipped alpha has %L in both fragments. I > used %N in my current 4.1.2 set-up probably because that's what someone > suggested. I'm not clear on the differences between the two parameters, as > they both seem to refer to the same server (unless I misunderstand > something...). We should go with whichever option makes most sense and be > consistent across all affected fragments. No, you're quite right. I _thought_ we used %N, but we do in fact use %L I am more comfortable with %N as (as Charlie has said), we know that this resolves to "this server". Gordon -- Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] VP Engineering Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
