On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:14, Lionel wrote: > Just letting you know that I've finally gotten around to investigating > the problem with this feature that I discovered some months ago:
[...] > Which is functionally the same, but without the '&system=dyndns' field > that was screwing up the updates. > I don't know if this is broken in SME 5.0 or not, but it seems likely, > as I suspect that I'm the only person on the list who's using the Dyndns > freebie service. I noticed the same when I upgraded to SMEv5, although since I need to ensure that my backup MX record is also recorded, I've been using one of their own update clients for almost all the time since I upgraded... -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
