On Friday 08 February 2002 06:53 pm, you wrote: > On Friday, February 08, 2002, w9ya wrote: > > Well, that is the heart of the issue for me. I do not expect gateways to > > perform security functions as such. That is a bonus. I expect > > firewalls and > > protocols and security policy and common sense to work together > > to perform > > security functions. > > > > I am sugggesting that by incorporating firewalling into this product, and > > declaring it to be a "security solution", the die was cast to cause these > > issues we are now discussing. > > Understood, but I'm still curious about what other distros are successfully > running on the 2.4.x series kernel and have provided ways to masq pptp, > h323, icq, and all the others. We should work together as a community to > solve this issue, but I don't know what distros you are referring to, so I > (or anyone else for that matter) can't check how they did it. Please let > the list in on the distros that have done this, other than clarkconnect, > which you indicated earlier.
I guess I don't understand. If I can port forward, why are these an issue ? > > David M. Brown > Frick, Frick & Jetté Architects > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
