On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Greg J. Zartman wrote:
> > IYRC it was made available for testing > > the 2.2.3a build changes but should be removed as this definitely is not > > meant for SME usage. > > > This is true, but including SWAT certainly doesn't hurt anything. > Unless one is very familar with Samba, SWAT is not easy to get at. In > any event, standard Redhat build of Samba includes SWAT. I thought that > Mitel liked to use stock redhat unless there was a very good reason not > to??? Yes, but we don't use *all* of RedHat's RPMs. Your assertion about SWAT is not correct. Installing swat is harmless, but using it is not. Swat is incompatible with the e-smith/SME templated configuration system, just as are linuxconf, webmin, comanche, etc. Any configuration changes made using swat will be lost the next time a user/group/print/i-bay is modified. -- Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lead Product Developer Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com/ Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com/ Phone: +1 (613) 592 5660 or 592 2122 Fax: +1 (613) 592 1175 -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
