In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charlie Brady) wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Brandon Friedman wrote: > > > I agree Peter, it is a bit of a dirty fix but it works....if you can > > improve it please let me know how! > > He has, hasn't he? What wasn't mentioned in Brandon's original post, and what you seem to be ignoring, is the problems SME presents to those who want a network server with secure mail and net access facilities, but who do not want to, or are unable to, host their own mail and web servers. The e-smith product's single biggest problem is its need for the server to have the company domain name so that both internal and external mail can be processed correctly to a single email address per user. This blocks access to the company website at an ISP host both for updates, and to use facilities the site may provide. It makes company calendar and internal-external co-worker cooperation almost impossible. Brandon's offering solves these difficulties at a stroke. I followed his Howto and it worked instantly and perfectly. I'm now able to reconsider SME for my clients where I could not do so in standard form. Well done Brandon. Ed Form -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
