On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Robert van den Aker wrote: > I'm not using or requiring redhat-printerconf. But redhat-printerconf > requires LPRng, which is why the Red Hat packager for cups decided to make > the cups package provide LPRng.
Odd, I looked it up on rpmfind.net and recent versions of redhat-config-printer do not actually require LPRng. redhat-config-printer does conflict with older versions of LPRng (Bugzilla bug 92145), which is why cups "provides" a recent version of LPRng, but I can't find any reason why it should provide LPRng in the first place. Anyway, I better take this discussion to Red Hat bugzilla. Would still like to know if removing the "Provides: LPRng" would make the package properly upgrade over LPRng, though. -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
