Thanks for clarifying Michael. > That fragment and it's package are part of the commercial > release. phpSysInfo itself is licensed under the GPL. Make > use of it as you like. "Recommended upgrade" would be > incorrect in this case. I'll remove it if it causes > confusion, and make it available on request.
As for phpSysInfo-2.1-01es6.noarch.rpm, there are a few gpl contribs of phpSysInfo available that implement phpSysInfo for all SME releases already. I agree there is no harm in installing the above, but IMO it may get confusing. Might be best to remove this rpm from the updates. Alternately, if Mitel elects to keep the ServiceLink build published the community should then remove all contrib builds and create a contrib e-smith-phpSysInfo-x.x-x.noarch.rpm requiring phpSysInfo-2.1-01es6.noarch.rpm and adding the missing httpd.conf fragment to implement the above in all gpl releases. Is this more confusing or better? If better, I'll offer to build/release the contrib. Regards, Darrell -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
