On Tue, 8 May 2012 13:06:23 -0400 David Zeuthen wrote: >The fact that you bring companies into >the mix indicates a poor understanding of how open source communities >work.
Companies. I was under the impression red hat funded policykit and polkit directly. I wasn't the person to make the link between difficulty of usage and redhat being mainly financed by support. It came from forums. > That, and you include a lot of other information that > isn't needed to solve your problem. Fine, we'll leave out all the problems that you are causing people and are not open to discussion or criticism upon. Obviously you are so brilliant that you can't possibly do anything wrong and so can ignore all the forums criticising the usability of your work. I deidn't even mention the word xml and criticising doesn't mean they and I aren't grateful for the work that you do. What would RFCs be without criticism or OpenBSD without some flame. >Worse, you include a lot of >opinions that clearly indicate that you do not seem to understand how >udisks and polkit works nor why it's there. You make a lot of assumptions don't you. Ever heard the phrase assumption is the mother of all fups? I'm no expert but I have a grasp of it. Do you mean to do with multi-user setups? Please enlighten me to what brilliance polkit is doing security wise that sudo can't for mounting usbs. We'll ignore dbus/IPC attackability, polkit bugs and back channels. >Good luck, I'd seemingly need it if it was down to you. It's only an unmount command that I could have come up on the desktop, if I CAN'T HAVE IT IN NAUTILUS WITHOUT A RECOMPILE!. _______________________________________________ devkit-devel mailing list devkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/devkit-devel