On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 07:24:35PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > Is there someone in the universe using Freenet as a module rather than a > monolithic entity? I'd be interested in hearing about this. I'm personally developing a couple of projects around the Freenet base. It's not so attractive when my imports look like: import java.io.*; import java.util.*; import Freenet.contrib.*; Why does the concept of using Freenet as a module within other projects strike you as peculiar? Certainly you don't think everyone in the world is going to be content with the default functionality, do you? This is a powerful tool you guys are creating; there's a lot that can be done with it by using it as a piece in other puzzles. m. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. david
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. burtonator
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Brandon
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Tavin Cole
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Michael Carmack
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Steven Hazel
- Re: [freenet-devl] Freenet CVS could be organized better. Brandon
