On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Mr.Bad wrote:
> >>>>> "DM" == David McNab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> DM> Thanks Tavin Does this mean that: TLA@somekey// is the new MSK
> DM> syntax?
>
> DM> Sorry for ignorance, I remember reading that the '//' notation
> DM> was being removed.
>
> DM> Also, will the new version command line and fproxy clients be
> DM> backward compatible with old metadata syntax, so as not to
> DM> break existing freesites?
>
> David, this isn't going to happen until 0.4, so don't sweat it for
> now.
>
Is there a good reason that clients shouldn't convert over to the new
metadata spec now? I know we're still working on it, and things may
change yet, but there's no reason not to begin migrating sites to the
new system sooner than later. The more sites there are when we migrate,
the harder the migration will be.
Can we get fproxy at least to suppost both kinds of metadata, as well as
for gj's insert utils to create them? The sooner we're using the new
metadata, the better.
Thelema
--
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you love something, set it free.
GPG 1536g/B9C5D1F7 fpr:075A A3F7 F70B 1397 345D A67E 70AA 820B A806 F95D
PGP signature
